close
Chapter One: Education as a Necessity of Life(第一章：教育是生活之必須)
3. The Place of Formal Education.
There is, accordingly, a marked difference between the education which every one gets from living with others, as long as he really lives instead of just continuing to subsist, and the deliberate educating of the young. In the former case the education is incidental; it is natural and important, but it is not the express reason of the association. While it may be said, without exaggeration, that the measure of the worth of any social institution, economic, domestic, political, legal, religious, is its effect in enlarging and improving experience; yet this effect is not a part of its original motive, which is limited and more immediately practical. Religious associations began, for example, in the desire to secure the favor of overruling powers and to ward off evil influences; family life in the desire to gratify appetites and secure family perpetuity; systematic labor, for the most part, because of enslavement to others, etc. Only gradually was the by-product of the institution, its effect upon the quality and extent of conscious life, noted, and only more gradually still was this effect considered as a directive factor in the conduct of the institution. Even today, in our industrial life, apart from certain values of industriousness and thrift, the intellectual and emotional reaction of the forms of human association under which the world's work is carried on receives little attention as compared with physical output.
But in dealing with the young, the fact of association itself as an immediate human fact, gains in importance. While it is easy to ignore in our contact with them the effect of our acts upon their disposition, or to subordinate that educative effect to some external and tangible result, it is not so easy as in dealing with adults. The need of training is too evident; the pressure to accomplish a change in their attitude and habits is too urgent to leave these consequences wholly out of account. Since our chief business with them is to enable them to share in a common life we cannot help considering whether or no we are forming the powers which will secure this ability. If humanity has made some headway in realizing that the ultimate value of every institution is its distinctively human effect—its effect upon conscious experience—we may well believe that this lesson has been learned largely through dealings with the young.
We are thus led to distinguish, within the broad educational process which we have been so far considering, a more formal kind of education—that of direct tuition or schooling. In undeveloped social groups, we find very little formal teaching and training. Savage groups mainly rely for instilling needed dispositions into the young upon the same sort of association which keeps adults loyal to their group. They have no special devices, material, or institutions for teaching save in connection with initiation ceremonies by which the youth are inducted into full social membership. For the most part, they depend upon children learning the customs of the adults, acquiring their emotional set and stock of ideas, by sharing in what the elders are doing. In part, this sharing is direct, taking part in the occupations of adults and thus serving an apprenticeship; in part, it is indirect, through the dramatic plays in which children reproduce the actions of grown-ups and thus learn to know what they are like. To savages it would seem preposterous to seek out a place where nothing but learning was going on in order that one might learn.
But as civilization advances, the gap between the capacities of the young and the concerns of adults widens. Learning by direct sharing in the pursuits of grown-ups becomes increasingly difficult except in the case of the less advanced occupations. Much of what adults do is so remote in space and in meaning that playful imitation is less and less adequate to reproduce its spirit. Ability to share effectively in adult activities thus depends upon a prior training given with this end in view. Intentional agencies—schools—and explicit material—studies—are devised. The task of teaching certain things is delegated to a special group of persons.
Without such formal education, it is not possible to transmit all the resources and achievements of a complex society. It also opens a way to a kind of experience which would not be accessible to the young, if they were left to pick up their training in informal association with others, since books and the symbols of knowledge are mastered.
But there are conspicuous dangers attendant upon the transition from indirect to formal education. Sharing in actual pursuit, whether directly or vicariously in play, is at least personal and vital. These qualities compensate, in some measure, for the narrowness of available opportunities. Formal instruction, on the contrary, easily becomes remote and dead—abstract and bookish, to use the ordinary words of depreciation. What accumulated knowledge exists in low grade societies is at least put into practice; it is transmuted into character; it exists with the depth of meaning that attaches to its coming within urgent daily interests.
But in an advanced culture much which has to be learned is stored in symbols. It is far from translation into familiar acts and objects. Such material is relatively technical and superficial. Taking the ordinary standard of reality as a measure, it is artificial. For this measure is connection with practical concerns. Such material exists in a world by itself, unassimilated to ordinary customs of thought and expression. There is the standing danger that the material of formal instruction will be merely the subject matter of the schools, isolated from the subject matter of life-experience. The permanent social interests are likely to be lost from view. Those which have not been carried over into the structure of social life, but which remain largely matters of technical information expressed in symbols, are made conspicuous in schools. Thus we reach the ordinary notion of education: the notion which ignores its social necessity and its identity with all human association that affects conscious life, and which identifies it with imparting information about remote matters and the conveying of learning through verbal signs: the acquisition of literacy.
Hence one of the weightiest problems with which the philosophy of education has to cope is the method of keeping a proper balance between the informal and the formal, the incidental and the intentional, modes of education. When the acquiring of information and of technical intellectual skill do not influence the formation of a social disposition, ordinary vital experience fails to gain in meaning, while schooling, in so far, creates only "sharps" in learning—that is, egoistic specialists. To avoid a split between what men consciously know because they are aware of having learned it by a specific job of learning, and what they unconsciously know because they have absorbed it in the formation of their characters by intercourse with others, becomes an increasingly delicate task with every development of special schooling.
Summary. It is the very nature of life to strive to continue in being.
Since this continuance can be secured only by constant renewals, life is a self-renewing process. What nutrition and reproduction are to physiological life, education is to social life. This education consists primarily in transmission through communication. Communication is a process of sharing experience till it becomes a common possession. It modifies the disposition of both the parties who partake in it. That the ulterior significance of every mode of human association lies in the contribution which it makes to the improvement of the quality of experience is a fact most easily recognized in dealing with the immature. That is to say, while every social arrangement is educative in effect, the educative effect first becomes an important part of the purpose of the association in connection with the association of the older with the younger. As societies become more complex in structure and resources, the need of formal or intentional teaching and learning increases. As formal teaching and training grow in extent, there is the danger of creating an undesirable split between the experience gained in more direct associations and what is acquired in school. This danger was never greater than at the present time, on account of the rapid growth in the last few centuries of knowledge and technical modes of skill.
*Summary的Google翻譯：
概要。努力繼續存在是生命的本性。
由於只能通過不斷的更新來確保這種連續性，所以生活是一個自我更新的過程。營養和生殖對生理生活是什麼，教育對社會生活是什麼。這種教育主要包括通過交流傳播。交流是分享經驗直到成為共同財產的過程。它修改了參與其中的雙方的性格。人類交往的每一種模式的最根本的意義在於它對改善體驗質量的貢獻，這是在應對未成熟問題時最容易認識到的事實。就是說，儘管每種社會安排實際上都是教育性的，但教育效果首先成為老年人與年輕人之間的聯繫的重要組成部分。隨著社會的結構和資源變得越來越複雜，對正規或有意教與學的需求也在增加。隨著正規教學和培訓範圍的擴大，有可能在更直接的協會獲得的經驗與在學校獲得的經驗之間造成不希望的分裂。由於最近幾個世紀的知識和技術模式的迅速發展，這種危險從未比現在更大。
由於只能通過不斷的更新來確保這種連續性，所以生活是一個自我更新的過程。營養和生殖對生理生活是什麼，教育對社會生活是什麼。這種教育主要包括通過交流傳播。交流是分享經驗直到成為共同財產的過程。它修改了參與其中的雙方的性格。人類交往的每一種模式的最根本的意義在於它對改善體驗質量的貢獻，這是在應對未成熟問題時最容易認識到的事實。就是說，儘管每種社會安排實際上都是教育性的，但教育效果首先成為老年人與年輕人之間的聯繫的重要組成部分。隨著社會的結構和資源變得越來越複雜，對正規或有意教與學的需求也在增加。隨著正規教學和培訓範圍的擴大，有可能在更直接的協會獲得的經驗與在學校獲得的經驗之間造成不希望的分裂。由於最近幾個世紀的知識和技術模式的迅速發展，這種危險從未比現在更大。
**本文源自系必修“教育概論”的指定作業(系列未完待續)
**謝謝您閱讀到這裡，今天的文章到此結束，我們下次見掰掰~~
*貼上來源：
DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION by John Dewey
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/852/852-h/852-h.htm#link2HCH0001
喜歡我的文章的話，記得幫我文章點讚、關注我，或是閱讀本站更多文章喔~
其他本站更多文章↓↓
[教育統計學小品]相對地位量數：百分等級、百分位數、標準分數(Z分數、T分數)
《教育哲學》閱讀心得/筆記(2)──為什麼學生不應該隨意辱罵聖賢?為什麼學生應該虛心求教?
**歡迎您透過下列網址前往TAAZE讀冊平台購買此書**
**這將會幫助我獲得該書售價1%至2%的分潤**
**感謝您閱讀到這裡，祝福您有美好的一天，謝謝您😊~**
**TAAZE平台販售之二手書、新書皆可**
網址點這→《民主與教育︰教育對民主社會的特別意義》
文章標籤
全站熱搜
留言列表
明志科大系列特別企劃 (1)